This is the warmest it's been in the condo since, oh... October? I'm actually barefoot!Supposed to be even warmer, tomorrow. Maybe spring has sprung in the mid-South.
.
I often mention how ridiculous I think it is that Curly chooses this as one of his favorite perches... presumably so he can be close to me as I play on the 'puter. Picture, if you can, 15lbs. of brown tabby overflowing both sides of this thin edge of upholstered furniture (to give you an idea of scale, the squares in the fabric on the chair are 1").
Post-bird incident. Does he look proud of himself, or what?
A river runs through it. Well, behind it.
It's hard to tell what that is on the end of Curly's paw (and in the foreground, in front of the pine tree trunk), but rest assured, those are feathers. Curly's would-be lunch escaped, apparently... and how he came this close to snagging a bird, I have no idea. I just heard a commotion on the balcony, and in the split-second it took for me to look over to see what was going on, all I saw was Curly leaning over the rail, and a small cloud of feathers floating around him.
Get your minds out of the gutter, you scamps.
No, it's not a high-five -- he wanted full editorial control of this post! :)
It is sunny and warm today, so I thought I should get out with the camera and take a few pix. Unfortunately, this is the only one that I liked. These little bastids are solar-powered lamps, and they're just outside the west breezeway of my building. They're useless as a light source, but one of my neighbors thought they looked nice, so, here they are. I'm a nice enough neighbor that I retrieve them from wherever the wind blows them -- an event that happens about once a week.
For those who haven't heard the story, it goes like this: My wingnut friend, J.J., and his awesome wife Erica (pictured at right, with former Tennessee Titans WR Derrick Mason), convinced me -- after seeing how well their cat and I got along (and both of them knowing that I'd recently had to euthanize another cat who was briefly in my care, B.B. -- another story) -- that I should consider getting another cat. Since they'd adopted their kitty from Happy Tails, they talked me into driving down with them to Franklin one day to check into it all. Erica really just wanted an excuse to go back to see and interact with all the kitties, I am sure. :)
Just a few weeks later, I'd be resigning the best job of my life, due to ethical incompatibility... and a year or so later, losing my home. Curly was with me through all that, and beyond. On my worst day, he never fails to make me smile -- or, more often, laugh out loud, due to his antics, which only other cats can fully understand.
For the simple reason that I was holding the camera, backwards, at arm's length, and the photo was blurry. When life hands you lemons, make apple butter, y'know. You go to blog with the photos you have, not the photos you wish you had, etc., etc., etc.
Out the front door, down the steps, and to the end of the walkway, south. Believe it or not, kids were preparing to assult this "hill" with a plastic toboggan-ish item when I took this. Poor dears probably aren't used to seeing so much (heh!) snow.Jim,Mr. Brady responds:
I'm very much afraid you still don't get it. You're *still* using the line about Abramoff "directing money" to Democrats, when you've never presented anything in the pages of the WaPo that would indicate any such thing ever occurred.
It is misleading to say that Abramoff's "suggestions" of amounts that his Indian tribal clients should give to Democrats equate to "direction," since we do not know that the tribes gave the suggested amounts, nor do we know exactly how much money the tribes had given those same Democrats prior to their dealings with Abramoff.
If I'm wrong on these points, please let me know.
Otherwise, I think the WaPo *still* owes Democrats an apology.
-J.P.
Nashville, TN
Jeff,Now did I miss it, or was there anything in there at all that addressed how much these tribes had given to Democratic politicians prior to their dealings with Abramoff?
Thanks for your e-mail... Deborah and The Post's senior editors have posted links to articles and graphics to support the paper's reporting on the Abramoff issue at http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/washpostblog/2006/01/abramoff_covera.html and http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/washpostblog/2006/01/deborah_howell_.html. Obviously, you're entitled to your opinion of the conclusions, but wanted to pass on those links.
Thanks,
Jim Brady
Jim,.
Thank you for your timely response.
If I may, I'd like to clarify only one point with you: Do you feel the issue of how much money these tribes had given to Democratic legislators *prior to* their involvement with Jack Abramoff is irrelevant to the WaPo's choice of wording, in re: "directed," versus "suggested?"
Thanks again,
-J.P.
Nashville, TN
PoliticalBlogWar.com is ready to take your ads. We'll be adding features to the site in coming days, including a nice form, allowing you to circumvent the somewhat clunky method of e-mailing your order to us.
... tail! Get your minds out of the gutter. He got excited by a close fly-by (bird -- thankfully not a quail; no shotgun pellets came near), and this was taken only seconds after he jumped up onto the railing to get a better prowling perspective.
Here he is, again, sunning himself for the scant 20-minutes or so that he can each February morning on the balcony. The photo below shows the vantage from which I have to take the photo, since getting closer (or even opening the door, for that matter) causes him to want to roam around, gravitating towards me.
And it isn't just potential whistle-blowers whom they are attempting to intimidate, but journalists as well:Read more of this article here.At the same time, conservatives have attacked the disclosure of classified information as a illegal act, demanding a vigorous investigative effort to find and prosecute whoever disclosed classified information.So now we're a country which allows its leaders to flagrantly violate the law -- even cheering them on as they do it -- and we imprison the journalists who report that illegal behavior to the public. That sounds like a lot of things. The United States isn't one of them.
An upcoming article in Commentary magazine suggests that the newspaper might be prosecuted for violations of the Espionage Act and said, "What The New York Times has done is nothing less than to compromise the centerpiece of our defensive efforts in the war on terrorism."
And, as described by Milbank's column, it's particularly noteworthy how true conservative believer Bob Barr was treated like an evil traitor at the Conservative Political Action Conference held this weekend all because he is critical of The President's violations of FISA. Conservatism in some circles really has morphed into The Cult of George Bush, which is why any criticism of the Leader -- even when the criticism is based on conservative principles -- is deemed to be blasphemous to the Cause. This really tells you all you need to know about what "conservativsm" has come to mean in certain circles:Read more here.Barr answered in the affirmative. "Do we truly remain a society that believes that . . . every president must abide by the law of this country?" he posed. "I, as a conservative, say yes. I hope you as conservatives say yes."Even to be subjected to the idea that "Bush is off course" is traumatic and wrong. Such an opinion has no place at a "conservative" event, where only praise and reverence of the Commander-in-Chief is appropriate.
But nobody said anything in the deathly quiet audience. Barr merited only polite applause when he finished, and one man, Richard Sorcinelli, booed him loudly. "I can't believe I'm in a conservative hall listening to him say [Bush] is off course trying to defend the United States," Sorcinelli fumed.
People who self-identify as "conservatives" and have always been considered to be conservatives become liberal heathens the moment they dissent, even on the most non-ideological grounds, from a Bush decree. That’s because "conservatism" is now a term used to describe personal loyalty to the leader (just as "liberal" is used to describe disloyalty to that leader), and no longer refers to a set of beliefs about government.Read more here.
That "conservatism" has come to mean "loyalty to George Bush" is particularly ironic given how truly un-conservative the Administration is. It is not only the obvious (though significant) explosion of deficit spending under this Administration – and that explosion has occurred far beyond military or 9/11-related spending and extends into almost all arenas of domestic programs as well. Far beyond that is the fact that the core, defining attributes of political conservatism could not be any more foreign to the world view of the Bush follower.
We can't think of a president who has gone to the American people more often than George W. Bush has to ask them to forget about things like democracy, judicial process and the balance of powers — and just trust him. We also can't think of a president who has deserved that trust less.Read the whole editorial here.
This has been a central flaw of Mr. Bush's presidency for a long time. But last week produced a flood of evidence that vividly drove home the point.
But a smattering, but it's more than the 3-6" we got yesterday. Yes, Virginia, it does snow in Gnashvegas!
Taken this morning at ~10:30 a.m. The traffic will be murderous -- Gnashvegans can't even drive in rain, for cryin' out loud.
Okay, not his most enthusiastic playdate, I'll admit. But the camera guy can't operate the camera in handheld-mode, and move the string stick at the same time... he's just not that talented. Curly would much rather have the string dragged along the floor.
Ah, yes -- the perfect place for a nap -- on top of this leather Titans jacket that no mortal being would dare don before stepping out into public view!
I have to admit, even though I've been an Innernets guys since 1989, I don't fully understand the ins-and-outs of RSS. I haven't really tried, to be honest. Still, I wonder how the atom.xml thingie actually works here at Blogger.